By Eddy James, OzHouse.org
The libertard at Libertard Australia realized I was attacking him after I published his Abby Martin commentary on the site and around Facebook. In true Alex Jones fanboy fashion, he said I took him out of context – when it was perfectly within context.
Here are some of his responses:
The reason most libertarians and many of the extremely wealthy donate to charity IMHO is because they want to pay less tax… being taxed to help the poor is the bane of a libertards existence. Monsanto donates to charity. So does HSBC and Goldman Sachs. Am I expected to believe anyone who donates to charity must love the poor? Only if I was born yesterday. IF he has no problem helping the poor, why does he get all excited when Alan Jones calls to abolish Medicare? Why does he say Jones does not go far enough because Jones still wants the government to pay for the poor? Because his idea of liberty is fucking retarded. For all the libertarian texts available, you can sum up their entire ideology in one sentence: Survival of the fittest baby. It suits them until they themselves need welfare of course.
These people are obsessed with the idea that taxing is initiating force against them. The truth is they cannot stand their money going to the poor because they see the poor as lazy slobs. Their exact term is “unproductive people” but that is nothing but a politically correct code-term for anyone who needs any welfare, healthcare etc… They always complain about welfare for the poor, but they virtually never mention corporate welfare.
Notice how he threw in a Co-Intel-Pro accusation? In previous debates, he called me a communist. When I pointed out that he calls everyone who disagrees a communist, he then called me a pothead suffering from weed induced delusions. After that failed to gain any traction, he now accuses me of being Co-Intel-Pro.
Here is his second accusation:
Why would I praise a libertard that wants the poor to die in cages like in Hong Kong? Libertards are not much more than Republicans that want to smoke weed and shag hookers. Their delusions are serious business. If it wasn’t so serious I would be laughing my ass off. But this group of nut jobs want to bring Hong Kong to Australia, America, the UK and anywhere else they can. They are spending big $$$ to make their vision a reality. In this libertards case? $70,000 of his own money. If he had more to spare, he would spend more. Other wealthier libertarians are spending a lot more.
I did NO such thing libertard! I simply screenshotted you licking your lips (figuratively speaking) at Alan Jones calling for an end to Medicare and I stated the obvious. You don’t want the poor to have any safety net at all. I then proceeded to explain your batshit ideology so people understand why you say what you say. This response of yours is answering a question that was not asked. A rather common defence that politicians use against tough questions. As for charity filling the welfare void? More insanity. It did no such thing before welfare and it will do no such thing if we end welfare.
I watched these libertards for years before I started going after them. I must have seen this one and others go after removing the safety net for the poor 10,000 times. Whenever I brought up corporate welfare and corporate crime in their groups? They proceeded to place 100% of blame on the government. Alex Jones has taught him well. Whenever your exact quoted words in full context come back to haunt you? Simply claim it was taken out of context. The fanboys don’t bother checking to see if you are lying or not.
While I do agree there is unacceptable poverty right now, if we go back to the days that libertarians worship – the classical liberal era – we find homelessness and poverty at much higher rates than today. We find company stores and all sorts of exploitation that is not possible today because society eventually found it unacceptable. If Anthony truly believes he will lift people out of poverty by endorsing no safety net at all? He is more mentally ill than I first thought. One only needs to look at the wonderful free market magic of Hong Kong that has no safety net to see the elderly who have worked their whole lives in the free market Milton Friedman praised so highly -only to die in cages like animals:
And he wonders why I oppose his insanity? DOUBLE FACE PALM right here…
But wait, there is still more.
Here is his delusional mind running off into libertard commuphobe-land again. I have never once supported drone strikes. I have never supported any war – unlike Ron Paul.
Guns? I personally think if we just created a better society, then that would greatly reduce violence of any kind. I also think gun control is soon to be futile as 3d printers take off. You will probably be able to buy a disposable gun out of a vending machine in the future for $10. Here is a left-wing progressive explaining it:
As for personal attacks – I put up with this hypocrite calling me a communist and a pothead suffering from weed induced delusions before I said anything remotely personal. They are the biggest hypocrites I have met in my life. I wish I had screenshotted him saying it! (We have debated in the past)
Here was my final response…
No related posts.